Upload a Certificate of Analysis and get back an eight-section report that reads it in full — the chemistry, what it means clinically, how the batch compares with its strain, what it is worth, and where the certificate’s own limits are the limits of the analysis.
Minutes, not an afternoon. Every claim traced to the Cannabis Knowledge Foundation, every number read from the certificate itself.
A paid plan is required. View plans and pricing.
A single PDF, roughly eleven pages. Below is an excerpt from a real Full-panel certificate, to show the shape of it.
| Cannabinoid | wt % | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Total THC | 32.159 | High potency; top of the biologically plausible range |
| Total CBD | 0.095 | Negligible — no entourage buffer |
| THCA-A | 36.381 | Raw acid precursor; flower is unheated |
| CBGA | 1.030 | Notable precursor reserve |
A high-potency THC-dominant flower with an unusually even four-way terpene cluster, and an 82% match to the Gold-tier archival fingerprint for its strain — well within normal batch variation.
Illustrative excerpt from a published certificate. Figures are read from the certificate; the readings beside them are written by the analysis.
Sections that a certificate cannot support are omitted rather than filled in. A Basic panel with no terpene results gets an honest note in place of a fingerprint comparison, not a number invented from nothing.
COA reports require a paid plan. Open your workspace to use your access or view upgrade options.
Open COA ReportBasic, Basic Plus or Full panels, from any laboratory, in any source language. The certificate type is detected from the panels present, not asked for.
Terpene proportions are compared against an archive of roughly 2,900 chemovar fingerprints, each built from many independently tested batches.
A missing microbial panel, an unstated processing method, a strain name inferred from a filename — each is reported as a finding, never quietly papered over.
Every clinical claim carries an A/B/C grade and traces to the Cannabis Knowledge Foundation, so you can see how firmly the literature supports it.
For industry and professional use. Evidence-graded research summaries — not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a guarantee of efficacy. Not a substitute for statutory product testing or regulatory batch-release criteria.